MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2563655042 · doi:10.1055/s-0036-1582581

Link N as a Therapeutic Agent for Early Intervertebral Disc Degenertion

2016· article· en· W2563655042 on OpenAlexaff
Nizar AlGarni, Michael P. Grant, Laura M. Epure, Omar Salem, John Antoniou, Fackson Mwale

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Spine Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntervertebral discIn vivoMedicineDegeneration (medical)In vitroEx vivoIntervertebral diskPeptideMatrix metalloproteinaseTrypsinOrgan cultureGrowth factorCell biologyAnatomyPathologyChemistryInternal medicineBiochemistryBiologyEnzymeGeneticsReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose Although the disc has limited endogenous repair activity, induced repair of disc tissue may be possible by the intradiscal injection of growth factors to stimulate the production of disc matrix. We previously demonstrated that Link N (DHLSDNYTLDHDRAIH), a naturally occurring peptide generated by the N-terminal proteolytic fragmentation of link protein during tissue turnover, can act as a growth factor in the disc. It can stimulate matrix production in vitro, in vivo and in intact ex vivo human intervertebral discs (IVDs). We have recently discovered that AF cells have the ability to proteolytically process Link N resulting in a fragment spanning amino acid residues one-eight (US Patent # 61870394) – short Link N (sLink N). Our in vitro data indicates that the biologically active sequence is preserved within this fragment and, thus, sLink N could represent a potential stable growth factor able to stimulate disc repair. Separately, we developed a long-term organ culture model with vertebral bone. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of sLink N and compare its efficacy to Link N in this novel organ culture model of early disc degeneration. Method Caudal IVDs from the tails of 20–24 months old steers were isolated with adjacent vertebral bone. After seven days of preconditioning in culture, degeneration was induced in IVDs by a single injection of 50 μg trypsin into the NP. Seven days after induced-degeneration, the trypsin-treated discs were injected with either sLink N or Link N (100 μg/disc, n = six discs/group). Four of the trypsin-treated degenerate discs were injected with PBS alone to serve as a control for degeneration while four discs served as non-degeneration controls. At two, four and eight weeks post treatment, two discs from each treatment and control groups were processed for biochemical analyses. Proteoglycan (predominantly aggrecan) synthesis in the NP was monitored as sulfated glycosaminoglycan using dimethylmethylene blue dye-binding assay, and Western blotting was performed to determine the expression of aggrecan and type two collagen in the tissue. Results Without intervention, at all time points, the GAG content in degenerate discs dropped to ~50% of that in non-degenerate controls. In contrast, sLink N, significantly increased the GAG and collagen content of the discs compared with that in degeneration control discs. Conclusion The results revealed that sLink N has the ability to restore tissue content in an early state of disc degeneration. These results have implications in relation to using either sLink N in regenerating a functional NP in the degenerated IVD or in retarding disc degeneration. Separately, we have developed and validated a novel long-term IVD organ culture model that retains vertebral bone and easy to prepare. Our model is ideal for testing potential drugs and alternate-based therapies, in addition to investigating the long-term effects of loading paradigms on disc degeneration and repair. Disclosures: None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Spine JournalSame topicSpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyFrench-language works237,207