MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2563703436 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2015-2792

Abstract 2792: Polymorphisms in vitamin D-related genes and risk of breast cancer

2015· article· en· W2563703436 on OpenAlexaffabout
Joy Shi, Anne Grundy, Harriet Richardson, Angela Brooks‐Wilson, John J. Spinelli, Kristan J. Aronson

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVitamin D Research Studies
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer AgencyAlberta Health ServicesQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalcitriol receptorBreast cancerSingle-nucleotide polymorphismInternal medicineEstrogen receptorCancerVitamin D and neurologyOncologyEstrogen receptor alphaEndocrinologyMedicineBiologyCancer researchGeneGeneticsGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Vitamin D is hypothesized to decrease breast cancer risk by controlling cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis, and estrogen synthesis and signalling in breast tissue. Transport of circulating vitamin D to sites of action is facilitated by vitamin D binding protein, encoded by the GC gene, whereupon it binds to the vitamin D receptor, encoded by the VDR gene. Given that polymorphisms in the GC and VDR gene have not been consistently associated with breast cancer risk, our objective was to assess the associations of vitamin D-related genes with breast cancer risk, accounting for ethnicity and menopausal status, and to determine these associations according to tumour receptor status defined by expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2). A case-control study of 1,037 breast cancer cases and 1,050 controls age-frequency matched in Vancouver, British Columbia and Kingston, Ontario was used. The distribution and associations of 21 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the GC and VDR gene with breast cancer risk and breast tumour subtypes were investigated among premenopausal and postmenopausal European and Asian women in stratified analyses. Following false discovery rate adjustment, no SNP was associated with breast cancer risk among any subgroup. However, among European women, two SNPs in the VDR gene, rs1544410 (OR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.21 - 0.70) and rs7967152 (OR = 2.80, 95% CI: 1.62 - 4.85) were associated with risk of ER-/PR-/HER2+ breast tumour subtype, but not with other breast tumour subtypes. Breast tumour subtypes are proposed to be etiologically distinct disease states, with different risk factors and prognostic outcomes. Interactions between variations in vitamin D-related genes and breast tumour subtypes are biologically plausible given our current understanding of anticarcinogenic properties of vitamin D elicited through the regulation of cell growth and reproductive hormone synthesis. These findings provide additional insight into the etiologic differences among breast tumour subtypes. Citation Format: Joy Shi, Anne Grundy, Harriet Richardson, Angela Brooks-Wilson, John Spinelli, Kristan J. Aronson. Polymorphisms in vitamin D-related genes and risk of breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 2792. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-2792

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicVitamin D Research Studies→French-language works237,207→