MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2563754783 · doi:10.1093/biolreprod/83.s1.495

Suppression of Mitochondrial Activity in Activated Bovine Sperm Advances Capacitation Status and Induces Normal Embryogenesis.

2010· article· en· W2563754783 on OpenAlexaff
Yoku Kato, Rui Miyamoto, Janice L. Bailey, Yoshikazu Nagao

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of Reproduction · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpermCapacitationBiologyAndrologyBlastocystMitochondrionHyperactivationSperm motilityCell biologyEmbryogenesisEmbryoReactive oxygen speciesGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have previously shown that activated bovine sperm induce capacitation. Activated sperm can fertilize normally. However, our previous study also indicated that the selection and injection (ICSI) of activated and hyperactivated sperm into bovine oocytes induced chromosomal aberration during early stages of development. Activation of sperm motility is a highly energetic process. Mitochondria produce significant amounts of ATP and reactive oxygen species (ROS) in those motile sperm. There is a possibility that ROS produced by activated sperm affect embryogenesis following sperm incorporation, resulting in chromosomal aberration. Here, we examined sperm capacitation state, ROS production along with the developmental ability of embryos following intracytoplasmic injection of activated sperm in which mitochondrial activity had been reduced experimentally. In the first experiment, we used a luminometer to investigate ROS production by sperm treated with carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl hydrazone (cccp), an uncoupler of cell respiration. In our second experiment, mitochondria integrity and activity was determined quantitatively using mitotracker red and 5, 50, 6, 60-tetrachloro-1, 10, 3, 30-tetraethylbenzimidazolyl- carbocyanine iodide (JC-1) in groups of normal motile sperm (control group), activated (Act group) sperm, and activated sperm in which mitochondrial activity had been reduced by cccp (MT group). The proportion of sperm exhibiting a characteristic pattern of capacitation was visualized by chlortetracycline staining and tyrosine phosphorylation in each experimental group. In our third experiment, we examined how sperm from each experimental group might affect developmental competence of an embryo produced by ICSI, including cleavage, development to the blastocyst stage, and chromosomal integrity of the blastocyst stage. ROS produced by mitochondria was decreased by cccp. Mitochondrial integrity, as assessed by mitotracker red was intact in all group and the proportion of active mitochondria as indicated by JC-1 was 82.4%, 83.3% and 33.3%, in the control group, Act group and MT group, respectively (P<0.05). The proportion of sperm exhibiting the characteristic pattern of capacitation, as determined by chlortetracycline staining, was 58.3%, 71.4% and 71.4% in the control group, Act group and MT group, respectively, whilst levels of tyrosine phosphorylation were 0.0%, 26.9% and 61.8% (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the rate of embryo development to the blastocyst stage among the three groups (20.7% vs 25.0% vs 31.4% respectively, P>0.05). On the other hand, chromosomal integrity of the blastocyst stage in the MT and control groups were higher than in the Act group (78.6%:11/14 vs 86.7%:13/15 vs 7.1%:1/14, respectively, P<0.05). Our results indicate that suppression of mitochondorial activity in activated bovine sperm reduce ROS production but induce normal embryogenesis following ICSI. (poster)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of ReproductionSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207