MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2563763166 · doi:10.1109/camad.2016.7790327

Latency-aware segmentation and trust system placement in smart grid SCADA networks

2016· article· en· W2563763166 on OpenAlexaff
Md. Mahmud Hasan, Hussein T. Mouftah

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Security and Resilience
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSCADAComputer scienceLatency (audio)ExploitComputer networkNetwork topologyIntrusion detection systemDistributed computingSmart gridNode (physics)Computer securityEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a latency-aware trust system placement scheme for smart grid SCADA networks. Trust systems are specialized security devices that are deployed to provide cyber protection to supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems. Their functionalities include firewalling and intrusion detection. They are capable of monitoring both types of traffic, ingress and egress. Only a selected number of nodes are equipped with trust systems due to budgetary constraints. Those nodes are known as the trust nodes. As trust nodes are responsible for distributing time critical messages, it is important to consider the impact of latency in the selection of trust nodes. Network segmentation is a commonly used way of trust node computations. This paper proposes a latency-aware segmentation approach that exploits the graph theoretic properties of minimum spanning trees (MSTs). Numerical results are obtained through case studies for the IEEE BUS 118 test system topology. The results reveal that the proposed scheme is capable of reducing the impact of latency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.548
Threshold uncertainty score0.226

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Grid Security and ResilienceFrench-language works237,207