MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplant after Failed Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization Does Not Adversely Affect Engraftment or Transplant Related Toxicity.

2005· article· en· W2563902799 on OpenAlexaff
Benjamin Rioux‐Massé, Jean Roy, Robert Bélanger, Denis‐Claude Roy, Lambert Busque, Douglas Fish, Guy Sauvageau, Thomas Kiss, Sandra Cohen

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Canadian institutionsHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMultiple myelomaBone marrowChemotherapyStem cellSurgeryInternal medicinePlerixaforTransplantationHaematopoiesisCD34GastroenterologyCXCR4Biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Chemotherapy and G-CSF are widely used to collect adequate numbers of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) prior to autologous transplant. However, 10–30% of patients (pts) will not mobilize adequately. Alternatives include use of stem cell factor (SCF) and bone marrow (BM) harvest. Limited information is available on the hematopoietic reconstitution and clinical outcome of intensively treated pts who fail to mobilize sufficient numbers of PBSC and receive BM grafts. We sought to determine whether BM is an acceptable source of stem cells in these pts. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of toxicity, engraftment parameters, transfusion requirements and outcome in pts who failed mobilization and underwent unprimed BM harvest at our institution. Results: Between 02/97 and 07/05, 47 heavily pre-treated pts (male/female 22/27; median age 49, range 22–66) who failed mobilization underwent an autologous BM transplant. Diagnoses included non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (n=37: 17 low grade and 20 intermediate grade), Hodgkin’s lymphoma (n=6), and multiple myeloma (n=4). Median number of chemotherapy cycles prior to harvest was 11 (range 5–20); 17 pts (36%) had previously received radiotherapy. 42 pts had 1 mobilization attempt and 5 pts had 2 attempts. Mobilization regimens included chemotherapy(C) + G-CSF (n=27), C + G-CSF + SCF (n=20), G-CSF + SCF (n=4) and C + GM-CSF (n=1). G-CSF was given at a minimum dose of 10μg/kg/day. Pts were defined as poor mobilizers if the peak value of CD34+ cells during mobilization was lower than 10 cells/μL (n=33) or in the case of stem cell collection, if less than 1 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg were obtained (n=14). Conditioning regimens included: BEAC (n=38), Cy-TBI (n=5), high dose Melphalan (n=3), and BEAM (n=1). Infused median numbers of nucleated BM cells, CFU-GM and CD34+ cells per kilogram were 3.5×108 (range 1.0–21.6), 7.33×104 (range 0.3–52.7), and 1.1×106 (range 0.3–2.3), respectively. 34 pts received G-CSF during their hospitalization (median 12 days; range 2–38). Following transplant, median times to achieve an ANC > 0.5×109/L and platelet count >20×109/L were 19 (range 10–42) and 24 days (range 9–233), respectively; median time to RBC transfusion independence was 33 days (range 1–425). Median time to hospital discharge was 25 days (range 14–64). With a median follow-up of 36 months (range 1–97), Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall and disease-free survival at 3 years are 67% and 44%, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of transfusion independence for platelets and RBC at 3 months are 86% and 84%, and at 1 year 97% and 95%, respectively. 2 pts (4.3%) experienced procedure related deaths prior to day +100, one of cardiac insufficiency on day +3 and one of septic shock on day +90. Cumulative incidences of non relapse mortality at 1, 3 and 5 years were 4.3%, 10.6% and 14.9%, respectively. The incidence of post transplant MDS/AML was 10.6%. Conclusion: Autologous transplant with unprimed BM graft after failed PBSC mobilization does not adversely affect engraftment or transplant related toxicity significantly. Thus, hard to mobilize patients should not be excluded from a potentially curative treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation→French-language works237,207→