MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Hematological Testing Is Not Required with Every Dose of Bortezomib In Patients with Adequate Blood Counts at the Start of Each Cycle

2010· article· en· W2563947761 on OpenAlexaff
Pooja Raibagkar, Paul G. Richardson, Pieter Sonneveld, Michael W. Schuster, David Irwin, Edward A. Stadtmauer, Thierry Façon, Jean‐Luc Harousseau, Dina Ben‐Yehuda, Sagar Lonial, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Donna Reece, Jesús F. San Miguel, Joan Bladé, Mario Boccadoro, Rachel Neuwirth, Dixie-Lee Esseltine, Kenneth C. Anderson, Nikhil C. Munshi

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBortezomibMedicineNeutropeniaMultiple myelomaAbsolute neutrophil countDexamethasoneComplete blood countInternal medicineBlood countPlateletToxicitySurgeryGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 1963 Introduction: Bortezomib has significant activity in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) but can be associated with hematological toxicity. Based on this initial concern, patients (pts) receiving a standard dose and schedule of Bortezomib, twice a week for two weeks, are typically required to be evaluated for adequate blood counts before each bortezomib infusion. This prerequisite substantially increases the time patients need to be in the clinic putting both patients as well as health care providers at potentially increased inconvenience. In an effort to make bortezomib administration more convenient, we evaluated the need for monitoring complete blood counts (CBC) before each infusion by examining for any predictable changes in blood counts on days 4, 8 and 11, based on day 1 counts. Methods: We investigated the changes in neutophil and platelet counts in pts treated with bortezomib on the phase 3 APEX (Assessment of Proteasome Inhibition for Extending Remission) study. Pts with MM and measurable disease following 1 to 3 prior therapies were randomized to receive bortezomib at 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 for eight 3-week cycles, then on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 for three 5-week maintenance cycles, or dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1 to 4, 9 to 12, and 17 to 20 for four 5-week cycles, then days 1 to 4 for five 4-week cycles. Platelet count (Plt) and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) were recorded throughout, and incidences of thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were calculated. Results: Data from all 319 pts receiving bortezomib on this study have been analysed. In this relapsed pt population, 15% of pts had plt counts <100 ×109/L on day 1 of cycle 1. However, by cycle 1 day 11, 43% were below this limit; similarly an ANC <1.5×109/L on day 1 of cycle 1 was observed in 13% and on day 11, in 27%. To evaluate the need for CBC prior to every dose we then analyzed the shift in blood counts from day 1 of cycles 2–4 relative to days 4, 8, and 11 of each cycle. We observed that all pts with Plt ≥100 ×109/L on day 1 of cycles 2, 3, and 4 had Plt ≥20 ×109/L on Day 4, and 8; and 99% on day 11. Importantly none of the patients with plt count > 100 ×109/L on day 8 of cycles 2–4, had their plt count drop below 20 ×109/L on day 11. Similarly pts with ANC ≥ 1.5×109/L on day 1 of each cycles 2–4 had ANC ≥ 0.5 ×109/L on days 4, 8, and 11 in > 99% pts. It is also important to note that responding pts had higher counts on day 1 of each cycle and had a lesser drop in their Plt count and ANC with each treatment. Conclusions: These results suggest that the change in CBC with bortezomib treatment as monotherapy is predictable. Importantly, CBCs done on day 1 of cycle 2 and beyond were able to predict the chance of thrombocytopenia and neutropenia on days 4, 8, and 11. We would suggest that patients with a plt count > 100 ×109/L and ANC > 1.5 ×109/L on day 1 of cycle 2 and beyond may not require rechecking of CBCs on days 4, 8 and 11. Reducing the number of CBC's needed during each cycle may improve patient compliance and save time both for pts and health care providers as well as improve resource utilization. Disclosures: Richardson: Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sonneveld:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Facon:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Harousseau:Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lonial:Millennium, Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Onyx: Advisory Board, Consultancy; Millennium, Celgene, Novartis, Onyx, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Reece:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. San Miguel:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Blade:Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Boccadoro:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Neuwirth:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Esseltine:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment; Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership. Anderson:Millennium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Acetylon: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Munshi:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→