MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2563984425

II.呼吸器領域:3.悪性胸膜中皮腫

2011· article· ja· W2563984425 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
長谷川誠紀

Bibliographic record

Venue胸部外科 · 2011
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldMedicine
TopicOccupational and environmental lung diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtrapleural PneumonectomyMedicinePemetrexedPneumonectomySurgeryContext (archaeology)MesotheliomaMalignancyRadiation therapyChemotherapyCisplatinGeneral surgeryLung cancerOncologyInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare thoracic malignancy associated with very poorprognosis.Extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP), a very invasive surgery where en bloc resection of ipsilateralpleura, lung, and a part of diaphragm and pericardium is required, is performed with curative intent.However, EPP remains to be cytoreductive rather than radical surgery for MPM, because its goal ismacroscopic complete resection. In this context, preoperative chemotherapy with cisplatin and pemetrexed,followed by EPP and postoperative hemithoracic radiation is currently considered as “standardtherapy”for resectable MPM.Results of recent major clinical trials on trimodality treatment (TMT) for MPM were not encouraging;TMT was completed in approximately 50% of enrolled patients, and overall survival ranged 14 to18.4 months. However, in Toronto trial, median survival reached to 59 months in patients who had nomediastinal node involvement and completed the entire TMT. This fact clearly illustrates that patientselection plays a key roll in MPM treatment.An all-Japan clinical study on TMT feasibility is currently underway.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue胸部外科Same topicOccupational and environmental lung diseasesFrench-language works237,207