MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2564101523 · doi:10.5354/0719-0816.2011.56369

[no title]

2020· article· en· W2564101523 on OpenAlexaff
M.M. Budiarto.S.H., Benjamín Gómez C.

Bibliographic record

VenueEstudios de Administración · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Canadian institutionsSmiths Detection (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPersonaHumanitiesContext (archaeology)SociologyPsychologyPhilosophyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El presente trabajo intenta evaluar la importancia relativa de los factores que influyen sobre la felicidad y el bienestar subjetivo de las personas. Este trata de medir los factores que hacen que las personas sean más felices y cómo el contexto cultural influye en la percepción de felicidad. Se utiliza análisis conjunto que considera como variables independientes, el nivel de ingreso, seguridad, redes sociales, educación y estabilidad laboral. Los resultados sugieren que tanto en Chile como en Canadá el ingreso y la estabilidad laboral son los dos factores más relevantes para explicar la felicidad siendo en el caso de Chile ambos factores igualmente importantes y en Canadá el ingreso prácticamente duplica en importancia a la estabilidad laboral.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEstudios de AdministraciónSame topicPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionFrench-language works237,207