Charging Electric Vehicles : Developing Policy Options to Accommodate the at Home Charging of Garage Orphan Electric Vehicles in the Metro Vancouver Region
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The City of Vancouver and Metro Vancouver wish to develop a strategy to facilitate the at home charging of electric vehicles (EVs) where their owners do not have onsite parking but rather park their cars on the street when at home. To facilitate this, it is recommended that: 1. The City allow for power at 240 volts to be provided from the EV owner’s home to a vehicle charging station located in the boulevard in front of the owner’s home; 2. A standard be developed such that a charging station can be installed in a cost-effective manner; 3. Reserved EV parking be provided in front of the charging station; 4. The permitting system for the charging station be administratively simple; and, 5. BC Hydro be encouraged to adopt a time of use billing program and review its billing framework and other practices to assure support for EV owners. Further, it is recommended that: 1. The City of Vancouver proceed with a pilot project to encourage and facilitate the ownership of EVs; and 2. Utilizing lessons learned from the pilot project, that the program be rolled out across the entire City as soon as possible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".