MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2564227909 · doi:10.1182/blood.v124.21.722.722

Interim Analysis of the Mmrf Commpass Trial: Identification of Novel Rearrangements Potentially Associated with Disease Initiation and Progression

2014· article· en· W2564227909 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sagar Lonial, Venkata D. Yellapantula, Winnie S. Liang, Ahmet Kurdoglu, Jessica Aldrich, Christophe Legendre, Kristi Stephenson, Jonathan Adkins, Jackie McDonald, Adrienne Helland, Megan Russell, Austin Christofferson, Lori Cuyugan, Dan Rohrer, Alex Blanski, Meghan Hodges, Mmrf CoMMpass Network, Mary DeRome, Daniel Auclair, Pamela G. Kidd, Scott D. Jewell, David W. Craig, John D. Carpten, Jonathan J. Keats

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiple myelomaInterim analysisExomeMedicineClinical trialOncologyExome sequencingCancer researchInternal medicineBiologyGeneticsGenePhenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation (MMRF) CoMMpass trial (NCT0145429) is a longitudinal study of 1000 patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma. The study opened July 2011 and now includes over 650 patients from 91 sites in the United States, Canada and European Union. Each patient is required to receive an approved proteasome inhibitor, immunumodulatory agent, or both. Enriched tumor and matched constitutional samples are comprehensively analyzed using Long-Insert Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS), Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) and RNA sequencing (RNAseq). Clinical parameters, Quality of Life measurements and health care resource utilization values are collected at study entry and every three months for a minimum of five years. Additional bone marrow aspirates are collected and analyzed at each recurrence or progression of disease. An extensive clinical and molecular database, the MMRF Researcher Gateway (https://research.themmrf.org), has been developed to facilitate the rapid dissemination of the results and provides the myeloma community with a mechanism to analyze the data. In this current interim analysis, we report on 195 patients that are fully characterized at the molecular level. We focused this analysis on immunoglobulin translocations and inter-chromosomal fusion transcripts. As expected we detected the classic canonical t(4;14), t(6;14), t(11;14), and t(14;16) translocations targeting FGFR3/MMSET, CCND3, CCND1, and MAF respectively. Seven patients presented with t(8;14) rearrangements correlating with high expression of MYC. Novel translocations were detected targeting MAP3K14/NIK in two patients and NFKB1, TOP1MT, TXNDC2, APOL3, FCHSD2, PRICKLE1, and BCL2L1 in individual patients. Importantly, the matched RNAseq data confirmed the high expression of MAP3K14, NFKB1, TOP1MT, APOL3 and BCL2L1. Moreover, the anti-apoptotic isoform of BCL2L1, Bcl-xL, was the prominent transcript isoform detected. In several patients we detected multiple IgH translocations. For instance the BCL2L1 translocation occurred in a downstream class switch recombination region from one associated with a co-occurring t(11:14). We also analyzed the RNAseq dataset for inter-chromosomal fusion transcripts and leveraged the independent long-insert WGS data to validate the predicted fusions. The only recurrent fusion partner identified was IgH-MMSET created by t(4:14). Fusion transcripts were detected in individual patients between IgH elements and MYEOV and WWOX along with several of the novel IgH translocation partners; NFKB1, TOP1MT, and APOL3. Several genes are involved in multiple fusions but with different partners. Three independent fusions were detected between the highly expressed gene FCHSD2 and MYC, MAP3K14, and ANKRD55. Three additional fusions were detected between MAP3K14 and ELL, PLCG2, and CDC27, which produce hybrid MAP3K14 isoforms lacking the N-terminal negative regulatory domain. We also detected three independent fusions involving BRF1, which is typically not expressed in myeloma tumors. These appear to be markers of translocations occurring just centromeric of the strong 3’ IgH enhancers. Interestingly, two of the partners are located in a region of chromosome 12 harboring MDM2 and spiked expression of MDM2 was observed. Additional genes with multiple fusion events included NEDD9 and ARHGEF12. Integrating the WES and RNAseq datasets, we identified 3518 variants (median 14 per patient) where the variant allele detected by WES, was also detected in the RNAseq data, suggesting it is potentially biologically relevant. Of these, 44 distinct genes were mutated in at least 2% of patients. The most common mutations (>7 patients) occurred in KRAS, NRAS, IGLL5, DIS3, BRAF, ACTG1, EGR1, FAM46C, TRAF3, DUSP2, FGFR3, and PRR14L. We also identified a deletion of IKZF3/Aiolos in a patient who progressed rapidly on lenalidomide-dexamethasone. Alterations in Ikaros family members like Aiolos have recently been reported as a potential mechanism of resistance to IMiDs. As the study continues to mature, we expect it will provide unprecedented molecular characterization and correlating clinical datasets that will help define the determinants of response to anti-myeloma agents and facilitate future clinical trial designs, thus serving as a stepping-stone toward personalized medicine for myeloma patients. Disclosures Lonial: Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207