Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article proposes that a primary concern for Samuel Richardson in composing Clarissa (1747–48) was to represent women’s personhood as entirely constituted by sexual relations, with penetrative rape standing only as the most violent manifestation of a systematic instrumentalization of women’s bodies upon which eighteenth-century social institutions depended. Contrary to much critical commentary, I argue that the rape is widely detailed in a model of narrative dispersal: building narrative accounts of self-estrangement into other scenes of imposition against Clarissa’s body, Richardson continually shows readers the atomization of his heroine’s personhood that results from the pressures of heterosexual coupling. Richardson calls on readers to identify as sexual violation, and therefore as an act that devalues personhood, the sum total of incursions made on women, since courtship, marriage, property, seduction, and rape sort women into finite and rigid social positions based on their sex. Richardson’s feminist commitments are made apparent by his revelation that full personhood is only ever aspirational, and is in fact tragically unavailable, to women within a coercive heterosexual order that operationalizes their bodies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it