MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2564263935 · doi:10.21898/dia.v50i55.357

Los sueños de la razón: sobre Sosa, escepticismo e inseguridad

2016· article· es· W2564263935 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDiánoia Revista de Filosofía · 2016
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophical and Cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsTrent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p class="p1">En mi comentario sobre “Los sueños”, de Ernesto Sosa,1 (i) esbozo un argumento sencillo a favor del escepticismo en torno al conocimiento de percepción que se basa en la premisa —P2— de que las creencias de percepción no son seguras. En seguida (ii) explico cómo los puntos de vista poco ortodoxos de Sosa acerca de los sueños pueden usarse en contra de aquellos que defenderían P2 invocando el espectro de los sueños. Después de eso, (iii) examino dos argumentos dirigidos por Sosa en contra de la concepción ortodoxa: el argumento sobre la retención y el argumento sobre la irracionalidad. Finalmente, (iv) reflexiono sobre el modelo de los sueños como imaginación, al que irreverentemente me refiero como la concepción herética o la “herejía sosiana”.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.910
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it