MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2564434841

A Subsistence Perspective for the Transition to a New Civilization: An Ecofeminist Contribution to Degrowth

2016· article· en· W2564434841 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Veronika Bennholdt‐Thomsen

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian women's studies · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Economy and Marxism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthnologyHumanitiesSubsistence agricultureCivilizationPolitical sciencePhilosophySociologyGeographyArchaeologyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Apres des decennies domines par l’attitude qui a progres sivement discredite l’existence des autochtones, les paysans et les femmes a la maison, les choses finalement, changent. La perspective productiviste de la mondialisation seme le doute et on demande un nouveau respect envers la capacite de la nature. L’environnement et les desordres sociaux exigent un nouveau paradigme de la civilisation. Les feministes ont ouvert le debat eventuellement appele l’ecofeminisme dans les annees ’70. En Allemagne s’est enligne sur cette notion de ‘’ subsister’’ dans les pays du Tiers Monde. L’auteure a contribue au debat et presente quelques aspects cruciaux dans cet article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian women's studiesSame topicPolitical Economy and MarxismFrench-language works237,207