MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2564508811 · doi:10.1585/pfr.9.3406099

A Numerical Framework for Operational Solar Wind Prediction

2014· article· en· W2564508811 on OpenAlexafffund
Ljubomir Nikolić, L. Trichtchenko, D. H. Boteler

Bibliographic record

VenuePlasma and Fusion Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSolar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
FundersNatural Resources CanadaInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasCanadian Space AgencyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSolar windCoronal mass ejectionMagnetopausePhysicsWind speedCoronal holeMeteorologyEnvironmental scienceMagnetic field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report on the development of numerical components for an operational solar wind prediction framework. In particular, we discuss the coronal magnetic field component based on the potential field source surface and Schatten current sheet models, and the solar wind speed component which uses the empirical Wang-Sheeley-Arge relation between solar wind speed and open magnetic field lines. Using synoptic maps of photospheric fields in a stand-alone operational mode, the components provide the configuration of the global coronal magnetic field and prediction of the solar wind speed at 1AU. A good agreement between numerical prediction and solar wind speed observations has been found.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score0.401

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlasma and Fusion ResearchSame topicSolar and Space Plasma DynamicsFrench-language works237,207