MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2564514444 · doi:10.1080/23312009.2016.1273065

Crystal structure of bis(triphenylphosphonium) hexabromodigallate(II) in the correct space group: Conformational complexity in a heteroethane

2016· article· en· W2564514444 on OpenAlexafffund
Olivia N.J.M. Marasco, Sydney K. Wolny, Jackson P. Knott, Daniel Stuart, Tracey L. Roemmele, Renè T. Boeré

Bibliographic record

VenueCogent Chemistry · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCrystallography and molecular interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Lethbridge
KeywordsChemistryCrystallographyCrystal structureIonPhosphoniumHalogenAtom (system on chip)Group (periodic table)Stereochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The crystal structure of [Ph3PH]2[Ga2Br6], previously described as having a disordered anion in the space group R3¯, has been re-determined in the correct space group P3¯, where it is fully ordered. Interestingly, two-thirds of the [Ga2Br6]2− dianions have an intermediate conformation with a Br–Ga–Ga–Br torsion angle of 36.91 (1)°, while the remaining is staggered as required from adopting a site with inversion symmetry. In the lattice, [Ph3PH]+ ions lie along the same threefold axes as the dianions and are oriented such that the P–H bond is directed towards a gallium atom. The phosphonium ions lie back-to-back and interact with relatively strong T-interactions between phenyl rings on adjacent cations. DFT calculations at the B3LYP/6–311+G(fd,) level have been used to determine the barriers to rotation in [Ga2X6]2− ions. For X = Cl and X = Br, the barriers are found to be very small, with values of 4.3 and 5.1 kJ mol−1 for the two halogens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCogent ChemistrySame topicCrystallography and molecular interactionsFrench-language works237,207