La creazione di una figura politica: L’entrata in Napoli di Ipolita Maria Sforza Visconti d’Aragona, duchessa di Calabria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Il momento più alto di elaborazione e manifestazione dell’immagine pubblica di Ippolita Maria Sforza, duchessa di Calabria, si realizzò in occasione del viaggio che nell’estate 1465, da Milano a Napoli, doveva condurla sposa ad Alfonso d’Aragona. Il lungo itinerario attraverso quasi tutti gli stati della Penisola fu caricato sia da parte sforzesca che aragonese di molteplici valenze politiche, collegate alle relazioni tra il ducato e il regno, così che l’imponente corteo che scortò Ippolita si configurò come una vera e propria ambasceria con la missione di rinforzare l’asse Napoli-Milano. Ma quella che doveva essere un’autentica marcia trionfale fu invece puntellata di ritardi, intimidazioni di arresto e minacce di dietro front, prima dell’ingresso trionfale nella capitale che, con la complessa e suggestiva simbologia del cerimoniale aragonese, doveva infine consacrare il ruolo politico della futura (ma prematuramente morta) regina di Napoli.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".