MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2564683372

FACTORS INFLUENCING YOUNGSTERSâ BEHAVIOR TOWARDS ONLINE SHOPPING IN VELLORE DISTRICT OF TAMILNADU, INDIA

2016· article· en· W2564683372 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ajay Kumar Sharma

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTamilThe InternetPopulationPaymentBusinessAdvertisingMarketingComputer scienceMedicineWorld Wide WebFinance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Digital universe in India is doubling in size every two years and will multiply nine-fold between 2014 and 2020. As per ASSOCHAM, the value of Indian e-commerce market in 2012 was $8.5 billion and $16 billion in 2013 and it is estimated to be $56 billion in 2023. Sources of e-commerce depend on the effective shopping, prompt delivery and increased use of online payment mechanism. Online shopping has changed the face of marketing globally. It has helped in easier, simpler and faster business transactions. Today each and every household is using online shopping. India being a highly populated country is positively transforming towards online shopping. Therefore there is a huge scope for both business and teenagers in India for online selling and buying household goods. As the Indian population is adding more educated and expert in internet technology, online shopping is moving drastically. In this background, the present descriptive study is an attempt to investigate the important factors influencing teenager’s behaviour, attitude and perception towards online shopping in Vellore district of Tamil Nadu in India.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.111

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Internet Banking and CommerceSame topicTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourFrench-language works237,207