MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2564715300

On Cultivation Nonintellectual Factors in Teaching of Broadcasting and Hosting Art

2016· article· en· W2564715300 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fei Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in sociology of science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Media and Visual Art
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVolition (linguistics)Broadcasting (networking)Process (computing)Quality (philosophy)PsychologyCognitionComputer scienceComputer securityEpistemology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nonintellectual factors refer to psychological factors that are not directly engaged in the cognitive process of human’s thinking activities, usually including interest, emotion, motive, need, volition, etc. In recent years, it was found through researches on human brain education that nonintellectual factors are as important as intellectual factors in teaching of broadcasting and hosting art. In modern times, broadcasting and hosting are not small-scale activities anymore, but are geared to international standards and become global. In view of this, the specialty of broadcasting and hosting art becomes more demanding, and psychological quality becomes another huge challenge. This paper aims to discuss the cultivation of nonintellectual factors in teaching of broadcasting and hosting art.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.276
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.008
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in sociology of scienceSame topicDigital Media and Visual ArtFrench-language works237,207