«et sus bak skranken / om videnskapens kongelige lund». Om naturvitenskap, erkjennelse og kunst i Olaf Bulls «Ignis Ardens»
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SammendragOlaf Bulls kantate «Ignis Ardens» har i stor grad falt utenfor Bull-resepsjonens interessefelt, et forhold som trolig i hvert fall til dels skyldes at diktet med sin vitenskapelige tematikk har blitt oppfattet som fremmed overfor forestillingen om en spesifikt lyrisk erkjennelsesmåte. I den foreliggende artikkelen søkes en slik oppfatning utfordret ved at diktet tvert imot leses som en lyrisk fortolkning av vitenskapelig frambragte innsikter om menneskets grunnleggende eksistensvilkår. Lest i lys av samtidig naturvitenskapelig formidling forstås diktet her som en lyrisk iscenesettelse og behandling av en konflikt mellom et materialistisk og et idealistisk verdens- og vitenskapssyn, hvor kunsten til slutt – i allianse med moderne naturvitenskap – innsettes som veien til den sanneste og dypeste erkjennelsen av selve (menneske-)livets grunnvilkår. Slik forsøker jeg gjennom artikkelen ikke bare å fylle et tomrom i Bull-resepsjonen, men også å problematisere en formalistisk og (post-)nykritisk oppfatning av en grunnleggende motsetning mellom vitenskapelig og kunstnerisk frambragt erkjennelse, mellom sak og dikt.AbstractOlaf Bull’s cantata «Ignis Ardens» has largely been overlooked in the scholarly research on Bull’s poetry, probably due to the preconception that a poem such as this with its scientific subject is alien to the particular mode of realization often attributed to the genre of lyric poetry. In this article, I aim to challenge this view, reading the poem as a lyric interpretation of fundamental conditions of human existence newly conceived by advancing contemporary natural science. The poem is understood as a lyric display of a conflict between a materialistic and an idealistic preception of the world and of the sciences, a display in which art itself – in alliance with modern natural science – is made the privileged medium for the realization of the fundamentals of (human) life and existence. The article thus aims not only to fill a void in the scholarship on Olaf Bull, but also to problematize a Formalist and (post) New Critical conception of a polarity bewteen realization scientifically and lyrically produced, between subject matter and poetry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.093 | 0.043 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".