Zika Travel Policies May Reduce Women's Leadership in Global Health
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Organization (WHO) declared Zika a "Public Health Emergency of International Concern," based on growing evidence that women who have the Zika virus during pregnancy are at increased risk of having their children born with microcephaly. 1 On November 20, 2016, while this letter was in press, WHO declared that Zika was no longer a Public Health Emergency of International Concern because the link between Zika and microcephaly has been found to be robust and in need of a longer-term global strategy. To stem the spread of Zika, travel-related policies have been issued by federal public health agencies and are still in place, advising in particular pregnant women or women trying to become pregnant not to travel to areas with ongoing Zika virus outbreaks. 4 These policies may have the unintended result of decreasing women's input on the planning, implementation, and evaluation of global health projects. This is important to the field as a whole, because gender-balanced teams are crucial for implementing effective global health programs and projects. As a woman global health scholar and practitioner, I reflect on potential negative impacts of these Zika travel policies and recommend actions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it