MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2564775260 · doi:10.1182/blood.v116.21.726.726

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Clinical Outcome Study of ARC1779 In Patients with Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP)

2010· article· en· W2564775260 on OpenAlexaff
Spero R. Cataland, Flora Peyvandi, Pier Mannuccio Mannucci, Bernhard Lämmle, Johanna A. Kremer Hovinga, Samuel J. Machin, Marie Scully, James C. Gilbert, Paul Knoebl, Shangbin Yang, Haifeng Wu, Bernd Jilma

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicComplement system in diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThrombotic thrombocytopenic purpuraPlateletPlaceboGastroenterologyInternal medicineMicroangiopathic hemolytic anemiaSchistocyteSurgeryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 726 Background: ARC1779 is an aptamer that inhibits the prothrombotic function of VWF by binding the A1 domain of VWF and thereby blocking its interaction with the platelet GPIb receptor. It has been hypothesized that effective inhibition of the formation of microthrombi by ARC1779 during the acute treatment of TTP may result in short courses of plasma exchange (PE), but may also decrease end organ complications via the rapid inhibition of the development of microthrombotic disease. Patients: Eligibility for the study included a platelet count of <100 ×109/L, microangiopathic findings, and the absence of an alternative explanation. Exclusion criteria included, malignancy or co-morbid condition with a life expectancy <3 months, or an additional diagnosis that accounts for the thrombocytopenia and microangiopathic findings. A total of 9 subjects (7 ARC1779, 2 placebo) were enrolled prior to the study being terminated by the sponsor (Table 1). Methods: Patients were randomized (3:1) to either ARC1779 or placebo concurrently with therapy. ARC1779 was given as an intravenous loading dose (12.43 mg/kg) followed by a maintenance infusion (0.0006 mg/kg/min). The ARC1779 infusion continued during PE, but an additional re-loading dose (50% of the initial loading dose) was given at the completion of each PE. The infusion continued until achieving a response, defined by normalization of the platelet count (≥150 ×109) on each of 3 consecutive days, or to a maximum of 14 days. The dose was then tapered by 50% daily over two days and discontinued. Immune suppressive therapy (corticosteroids, rituximab) was permitted at investigator discretion. Treatment response, pharmacodynamic data (von Willebrand activity), and end organ injury (troponin-I, S100B) were studied prior to and throughout the treatment course. Results: All 9 patients received daily PE. 6/7 patients receiving ARC1779 achieved a response after a median of 6 days (range, 5–15) compared to the 2 placebo patients who did not achieve a response within 14 days. Serial measurement of the VWF activity in the context of ARC1779 concentration (Figure 1) and the median troponin-I and S100B concentrations for ARC1779 treated subjects are shown in Figure 2. There were no bleeding complications despite documented, prolonged inhibition of VWF activity throughout therapy with ARC1779. Conclusions: These data provide support for the concept of therapy directed at preventing the formation of microthombi in the treatment of acute TTP. The efficacy and safety of these novel therapeutic strategies will need to be assessed in the frame of large clinical trials, a challenge for clinical scientists who work on this rare disease. Disclosures: Cataland: Archemix Corp.: Consultancy. Peyvandi:Archemix Corp.: Consultancy. Mannucci:Archemix Corp.: Consultancy. Lämmle:Archemix Corp.: Consultancy. Kremer Hovinga:Archemix Corp.: Consultancy. Machin:Archemix Corp.: Consultancy. Scully:Archemix Corp.: Consultancy. Rock:Archemix Corp.: Consultancy. Gilbert:Archemix Corp.: Consultancy. Knoebl:Archemix Corp.: Consultancy. Jilma:Archemix Corp.: Consultancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.384
Threshold uncertainty score0.946

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicComplement system in diseasesFrench-language works237,207