MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Tumor suppressor effects for miR-215 identified through use of miRNA profiling in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

2012· article· en· W2564864626 on OpenAlexaff
Georg A. Bjarnason, Nicole M. White, Heba Khella, Joerg Grigull, Sonja Adzovic, Youssef M. Youssef, R. John D’A. Honey, Robert Stewart, Kenneth T. Pace, Michael A.S. Jewett, Andrew Evans, Manal Gabril, George M. Yousef

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsmicroRNARenal cell carcinomaMetastasisGene expression profilingMedicineCancer researchMicroarrayMicroarray analysis techniquesOncologyCancerGene expressionGeneInternal medicineBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

392 Background: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common neoplasm of the adult kidney. Metastatic RCC is difficult to treat. The five-year survival rate for metastatic RCC is <10%. Recently, microRNAs (miRNAs) have been shown to have a role in cancer metastasis and potential as prognostic biomarkers in cancer. Methods: We preformed a miRNA microarray to identify a miRNA signature characteristic of metastatic compared to primary RCC. Results were validated by quantitative real time PCR. Target prediction analysis and gene expression profiling identified many of the dysregulated miRNAs could target genes involved in tumor metastasis. The effect of miR-215 on cellular migration and invasion was shown in a RCC cell line model. Results: We identified 65 miRNAs that were significantly altered in metastatic when compared to primary RCC. Nine (14%) miRNAs had increased expression while 56 (86%) miRNAs showed decreased expression. miR-10b, miR-196a, and miR-27b were the most downregulated while miR-638, miR-1915, and miR-149* were the most upregulated. A non-supervised 2D-cluster analysis showed that a sub-group of the primary tumors clustered under the metastatic arm with a group of miRNAs that follow the same pattern of expression suggesting they have an inherited aggressive signature. We validated our results by examining the expressions of miR-10b, miR-126, miR-196a, miR-204, and miR-215, in two independent cohorts of patients. We also showed that overexpression of miR-215 decreased cellular migration and invasion in a RCC cell line model. In addition, through gene expression profiling, we identified direct and indirect targets of miR-215 that can contribute to tumor metastasis. Conclusions: Our analysis showed that miRNAs are altered in metastatic RCC and can contribute to kidney cancer metastasis through different biological processes. Dysregulated miRNAs represent potential prognostic biomarkers and may have therapeutic applications in kidney cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.135
GPT teacher head0.453
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCancer-related molecular mechanisms researchFrench-language works237,207