Usos y apropiaciones del espacio urbano en Santiago de Chile: La transformación de la cañada en alameda de las delicias
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolUna vez alcanzada la Independencia de Chile, fue necesario contar con un espacio publico que reflejara el desarrollo de una nueva vida republicana. Por esta razon, las autoridades buscaron transformar La Canada, un antiguo camino colonial, en un renovado paseo para la capital: la Alameda de las Delicias. A partir de su creacion en los primeros anos de la decada de 1820, el nuevo paseo reflejo y formo parte de los cambios culturales de las clases mas acomodadas de la capital durante el siglo XIX. El presente articulo analiza la manera en que esta transformacion implico cambios importantes en los usos y apropiaciones de este espacio de la ciudad, ademas de dar cuenta, a traves de imagenes, de la manera en que este paseo experimento el transito de la sociedad colonial a la republicana. EnglishAfter Chile’s Independence, it was necessary to create a public space that would reflect the development of a new republican life. Therefore, the authorities sought to transform La Canada, a former colonial road, into a renewed public boulevard for the capital city: the Alameda de las Delicias. Starting from its creation in the early 1820s, the new promenade reflected and was part of the cultural changes that affected the wealthiest classes of the capital during the 19th century. This article analyzes the ways in which this transformation generated important changes in the purposes and appropriations of this urban area. It also shows, through visual representations, the ways in which this promenade experimented the transition from a colonial to a republican society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".