MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2565141979 · doi:10.1093/ajhp/62.2.123

ASHP joins Mexican, Canadian societies in compact

2005· article· en· W2565141979 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Donna Young

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Health-System Pharmacy · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPharmacyGovernment (linguistics)CeremonyHospital pharmacyMedicineClinical pharmacyHealth careAdministration (probate law)Opening ceremonyFamily medicinePolitical scienceHistoryLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) entered into a cross-border agreement on December 6, 2004, with the Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacists (CSHP) and the Mexican Association of Hospital Pharmacists (MAHP) to improve the quality of care by advancing hospital pharmacy practice. The collaboration, known as the North American Compact on the Advancement of Hospital Pharmacy, “signals a commitment from our three associations to work together to better hospital pharmacists and hospital pharmacy practice,” said CSHP President Emily Lap Sum Musing, executive director of pharmacy services for the University Health Network of Toronto. Musing joined ASHP President T. Mark Woods and MAHP President Fela Viso Gurovich at a historic signing ceremony at the Society’s 39th Annual Mid-year Clinical Meeting in Orlando, Florida. To commemorate the event, Gurovich presented Woods and Musing with official government-issued copies of Farmacopea Herbolaria De Los Estados Unidos Mexicanos, a Mexican pharmacopoeia of traditional herbal medicines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.887
Threshold uncertainty score0.964

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.137
GPT teacher head0.448
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Health-System PharmacySame topicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesFrench-language works237,207