MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Aberrant Intronic Splicing of the Hyaluronan Synthase 1 Gene (HAS1) in Multiple Myeloma: A Biologically Relevant Marker That Predicts for Poor Survival.

2004· article· en· W2565149220 on OpenAlexaff
Sophia Adamia, Tony Reiman, Michael J. Mant, Andrew R. Belch, Linda M. Pilarski

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyaluronan synthaseBiologyIntronExonRNA splicingGenePhenotypeCancer researchGene expression profilingGene expressionMolecular biologyGeneticsRNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Hyaluronan synthases, plasma membrane proteins encoded by the HAS genes, synthesize different sizes of hyaluronan (HA), an extracellular matrix molecule which is biologically active in malignant spread and signaling. HA is also a ligand for RHAMM, a receptor, shown by our laboratory to regulate mitotic events. We demonstrated that abnormal expression of RHAMM in model systems results in mitotic abnormalities that may lead to chromosomal missegregation in multiple myeloma (MM). In MM patients we detected overexpression of HAS1 transcripts and we have identified three aberrantly spliced variants of HAS1 designated as HAS1Va, Vb, and Vc. The statistical analysis of samples from 58 MM patients taken at the time of diagnosis showed that expression of HAS1Vb either alone or in combination with HAS1 and variants in MM cells strongly correlates with poor survival (P=0.001). This expression analysis of HAS1 and variants in MM patients suggests that, particularly HAS1Vb may contribute to early myelomagenesis since these transcripts are detected individually or in combination with other HAS1 variants in MM and MGUS patients at the time of diagnosis. Longitudinal analysis of HAS1 and its variants in 18 unselected MM patients showed expression of the family of HAS1 transcripts in a majority of these patients at diagnosis (65% of patients) and relapse (71.4% of patients). All three HAS1 variants are truncated as the result of exon skipping and/or intron retention. In general, partial retention of introns appears to be characteristic of the genes associated with a malignant phenotype. Alignment and protein motif screening analysis showed that all three variants of HAS1 retain the motif, which is responsible for the synthesis of HA. In silico analysis demonstrated that HAS1 variants are able to fold appropriately. Protein expression of HAS1 variants was detected by western blotting using lysates from MM cell lines. Enzymatic activity of family of HAS1 proteins was verified by a particle exclusion assay (PEA) and HA staining. Using these methods we detect HA matrix and intracellular HA around and in MM cells. Based on PEA analysis, both HAS1Va and HAS1Vb appear to synthesize extracellular HA. Synthesis of extracellular HA by MM cells may impact disease biology by contributing to drug resistance and could accommodate spread of MM cells by facilitating motility and malignant spread. Furthermore, HAS1Vb, the only variant with strong clinical impact, also appears to be the only splice variant that produces intracellular HA, a form of HA that may modulate RHAMM associations with the mitotic spindle. The HA binding motif of RHAMM overlaps with its centrosomal targeting domain. Strong perinuclear localization of intracellular HA, which branches out from the perinuclear compartment toward the MM cell plasma membrane suggests that these molecules may also contribute to the maintenance of cellular architecture by malignant MM cells. We speculate that at least part of the strong clinical impact of aberrant HAS1Vb intronic splicing reflects the predicted ability of intracellular HA synthesized by HAS1Vb to modulate the function of RHAMM by inhibiting centrosomal targeting, thereby promoting aberrant mitosis. If this working hypothesis is correct, HAS1 and its variants, particularly HAS1Vb, in concert with RHAMM may be key contributors to chromosomal instability in MM. Funded by CIHR and by CA80963 from NCI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicProteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans researchFrench-language works237,207