MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2565164908 · doi:10.2196/iproc.6166

Preliminary Analysis of Worldwide Usage Patterns in a Mobile Palliative Care Reference App

2016· article· en· W2565164908 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
David Liu, J. Lacey Smith, Haipeng Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueIproceedings · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPalliative careMobile appsAndroid (operating system)World Wide WebMobile deviceComputer sciencePoint of careResource (disambiguation)Internet privacyNursingMedicineOperating systemComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Fast Facts and Concepts for iOS and Android is the world’s most downloaded point of care mobile reference application for palliative care providers. This free mobile app leverages the Fast Facts and Concepts article repository that was started in 1999 at the End-of-Life/Palliative Education Resource Center at the Medical College of Wisconsin. Our team released the initial iOS version of the app in summer of 2014. Since then, it has been downloaded over 13,000 times. Objective: The purpose of this project is to evaluate and describe user behaviors of palliative care clinicians on a global scale using an analytics layer integrated into Fast Facts and Concepts. Methods: An analytics layer was integrated and disclosed with version 1.0.3; an analytics event is triggered when an article is read or when a search is made. The event, along with anonymous user metadata, was sent to a Web server where it was segmented. Summary statistics were generated using Python scripts and include category weight, article rank, and search term clusters. We evaluated user behavior of the Fast Facts and Concepts app during a 3-month window to better understand the needs of the userbase. Results: Our dataset had 26,733 events and 1461 unique users from 41 countries collected over 3 months. Prognosis was the most active category, with searches for Palliative Performance Scale accounting for a third of prognosis reads. Articles about dosage featured heavily, especially on methadone titration. On the spectrum of illness, physiological categories such as gastrointestinal and renal diseases were generally more popular than psychiatric disorders. Articles about interpersonal skills from categories such as Communication; Ethics, Law, Policy; and Psychosocial and Spiritual Experience were the least read. All of our conclusions are supported by chi-squared tests with P values <.01. More detailed results are included in the poster. Conclusions: This analysis shows that most users consult the app for guidance in symptom management and prognosis. The usage patterns described above suggest that the app is likely being used at the point of care as a clinical reference for medical decision making and therapeutic guidance. Our study provides evidence that mobile applications can be effective tools to distribute quality palliative care resources on a global scale. Our results also indicate which topics should be emphasized in medical education and how increased vigilance about these topics can optimize patient care; with a large active user base, we have the opportunity to make even more precise conclusions in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.427

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIproceedingsSame topicPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesFrench-language works237,207