Систематизация зарубежного опыта развития малых территорий
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The analysis of experience of foreign countries in the field of methodology of strategic planning, can promote improvement of the Russian practice essentially. For example, the high and spontaneously created concentration of the population and the industry in the certain large cities constrains further development of productive capacities. In such cities there is the industrial narrowness, deficiency of the free land plots, difficulties in a city life support system, deterioration of ecology and many other things. The author investigated the developed tendencies: growth, change in production sectors of the cities, in its population, labor and other social spheres. At the present stage of development of the territory there are levels of planning of a social and economic development of the city: comprehensive planning, program and political planning, and also design planning with the coordinating process of strategic planning. Experience of development of small territories of foreign countries represents a great interest for possible adaptation in modern Russian conditions. In planning and control of social and economic development of the small cities in the USA there is a set of indicators reflecting quality of life of the living population in the small city. Experience of Great Britain, France, Japan who accepted the statutes stimulating placement of productive forces in the small cities isn't less interesting. Germany and England pursue policy of strengthening of economic base of the small city by means of placement in them the minor enterprises and maintenance of traditional productions and crafts today. In Japan they created project for one of districts of Tokyo. The British experience of local governments of the small cities is interesting to adaptation to the Russian reality. In Canada specially created professional associations of specialists in economic development which members take part in activities for strengthening and diversification of local economy function. In the USA don't seek to develop the giant cities, systematically develop the so-called cities fields which in the future have to unite all territory of the USA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".