MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2565217509 · doi:10.29321/maj.10.001203

Stability Analysis in Barnyardmillet (Echinochloa frumentacea (Roxb.) Link.) Genotypes

2011· article· en· W2565217509 on OpenAlexfundno aff
S. Revathi, V. Ulaganathan, C. Priyadharshini, T. N. Balasubramanian

Bibliographic record

VenueMadras Agricultural Journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural Science and Fertilization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsGenotypeGrain yieldEchinochloaMaturity (psychological)BiologyLinear regressionGene–environment interactionYield (engineering)Mean squarePooled analysisAnimal scienceAgronomyHorticultureMathematicsStatisticsConfidence intervalGeneGeneticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Five barnyardmillet genotypes viz., Sadai kudiraivali, Pullu kudiraivali, CO (KV) 2, VL 29 and VL 172 were evaluated over five different environments to study the stability parameters viz., regression coefficient (bi) and mean square deviations (S 2 d i ). Variances due to genotype, environment, genotype x environment, environment (linear) and pooled deviation were significant for days to 50 per cent flowering, days to maturity, plant height and grain yield. Based on the stability analysis, the genotype CO (KV) 2 was found to be stable across five different environments for days to maturity, plant height and grain yield. Hence, it may be recommended for the commercial cultivation in these five environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMadras Agricultural JournalSame topicAgricultural Science and FertilizationFrench-language works237,207