MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract CT217: Phase I/II study of dianhydrogalactitol in patients with recurrent malignant glioblastoma multiforme

2015· article· en· W2565225485 on OpenAlexaff
Kent C. Shih, Manish R. Patel, Nicholas Butowski, Jeffrey Bacha, Dennis Brown, Anne Steinø, Richard Schwartz, Sarath Kanekal, Lorena M. Lopez, Howard A. Burris

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsDelmar (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTemozolomideMedicineClinical trialRegimenOncologyCancerAdverse effectInternal medicineChemotherapyDosingPhases of clinical researchRadiosensitizerPharmacologyRadiation therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and deadly form of human brain cancer. Median survival for patients with recurrent GBM is <6 months. Front-line systemic therapy is temozolomide, but resistance due to O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) activity is implicated in poor prognoses. Dianhydrogalactitol (VAL-083) is a structurally unique bi-functional DNA alkylating agent that crosses the blood-brain barrier and accumulates in brain tumor tissue. In recent in vitro studies, VAL-083 overcame resistance to MGMT and demonstrated cytotoxic activity against GBM cell lines, as well as GBM cancer stem cells, and was shown to act as a radiosensitizer. Previous clinical trials suggest that VAL-083 has activity against a range of tumors, including GBM. In light of extensive safety data and promising efficacy in CNS tumors, we initiated a new phase I/II clinical study to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) using an optimized dosing scheme. The goal of the current clinical trial is to determine an appropriate dose for advancement into registration trials as a potential new therapy for the treatment of refractory GBM. Historical NCI-sponsored studies in GBM achieved promising results with limited toxicity using a dosing regimen of 25mg/m2/day for five days every five weeks. The present dosing regimen utilizes a daily dose for three days every three weeks. Seven cohorts have completed the current trial with no drug-related serious adverse events: MTD was not yet reached at 40mg/m2/day; 50mg/m2/day is being studied and higher doses may be explored. Compared to historical trials, the present regimen delivers substantively more drug as measured by Cmax and dose density. A dose density of 25 mg/m2/week in combination with radiation was previously shown superior to radiation alone against GBM; a dose density of 50 mg/m2/week is being enrolled in the current trial. Pharmacokinetic analyses show dose-dependent linear systemic exposure with a short plasma 1-2h terminal half-life; Cmax at 40mg/m2 in the current trial ranged from 1130-739ng/mL (7.7-5.1μM). Calculated CNS tissue concentrations, based on the plasma concentrations, exceed concentrations known to be effective against glioma cell lines in vitro. Methods: Open-label, single-arm phase I/II dose-escalation study in patients with histologically-confirmed initial diagnosis of primary WHO Grade IV malignant glioma (glioblastoma). Patients enrolled have previously been treated with surgery and/or radiation, if appropriate, and must have failed both bevacizumab and temozolomide, unless contraindicated. The study utilizes a 3+3 dose-escalation design. Patients receive VAL-083 IV on days 1, 2, and 3 of a 21-day cycle. Tumor response is assessed according to RANO criteria prior to every other 21-day treatment cycle, and patients exhibiting stable disease or tumor regression are allowed to remain on study drug. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01478178. Citation Format: Kent C. Shih, Manish R. Patel, Nicholas Butowski, Jeffrey A. Bacha, Dennis M. Brown, Anne Steino, Richard Schwartz, Sarath Kanekal, Lorena M. Lopez, Howard A. Burris. Phase I/II study of dianhydrogalactitol in patients with recurrent malignant glioblastoma multiforme. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr CT217. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-CT217

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→