MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2565242297 · doi:10.1016/s1525-0016(16)33972-7

363. Laser-Triggered Gold Nanoparticle-Assisted Cell Poration for Selective Gene Delivery

2015· article· en· W2565242297 on OpenAlexaff
Weimeng Ding, Christos Boutopoulos, Éric Bergeron, Ariel M. Wilson, Santiago Costantino, Przemysław Sapieha, Michel Meunier

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Therapy · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalUniversité de MontréalHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColloidal goldMaterials scienceLaserBiophysicsNanoparticleNanotechnologyTransfectionCell membraneIrradiationPlasmonMembraneChemistryCell cultureOptoelectronicsOpticsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present an innovative approach using laser-triggered plasmonic gold nanoparticles to selectively transfect cells. This method emerged from the combination of the recent progress in photonics and nanotechnologies. To perform the laser-triggered delivery, spherical gold nanoparticles (d=100 nm) were first dispersed onto cells in vitro in a medium containing fluorescent molecules or exogenous genes, and then irradiated with a scanning picosecond laser beam at high repetition rate (f = 76 MHz, wavelength λ =1064 nm, pulse width τ = 7.5 ps). When irradiated under appropriate conditions, the gold nanoparticles locally amplify the laser energy (plasmonic effect) and create transient pores on the cell membranes, allowing the penetration of surrounding molecules or genes through the plasma membrane by fluid exchange. After the delivery, the cell membranes rapidly self-reseal and the cells continue to thrive. Our technique presents several advantages: First, the method is safe. Gold nanoparticles are biocompatible and are believed to be non-toxic both in vitro and in vivo at low concentration. The emitted laser energy in the near infrared is weak and harmless to the tissue, and is only amplified in the nearfield of gold nanoparticles within submicron distance. Second, the transfection is temporally and spatially controlled by the pattern of irradiation. Gold nanoparticles can be conjugated to selectively target and transfect desired cell populations. We performed experiments on different cell types including breast cancer cells, ocular epithelium cells and neurons. Cell poration efficiency increased with laser energy up to a certain threshold, and decreased as mortality became important at higher irradiation fluence. The optimal conditions for irradiation vary from one cell line to another. The general poration efficiency could reach 30-70% depending on the cell line, with mortality as low as < 3%. Ongoing in vitro and ex vivo experiments will be presented. Our studies suggest that the laser-triggered gold nanoparticle-assisted cell transfection is a promising physical delivery method enabling efficient, safe and selective gene delivery in a variety of cells. It is anticipated that it would be an increasingly useful tool for the development and improvement of new gene therapy for prevalent diseases such as cancers or neural degenerative diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.856

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular TherapySame topicLaser-Ablation Synthesis of NanoparticlesFrench-language works237,207