MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2565322119 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofw172.1548

Assessment of the Propensity of Oritavancin to Induce Susceptibility Changes Among Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Carriage Isolates in a Phase 2 study in Patients with Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections

2016· article· en· W2565322119 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPlant-based Medicinal Research
Canadian institutionsCARE Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStaphylococcus aureusCarriageSkin infectionMicrobiologyMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusStaphylococcal infectionsStaphylococcal Skin InfectionsBacteriaBiologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. The lipoglycopeptide oritavancin (ORI) is approved for the treatment of adults with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) due to Gram-positive organisms including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Whether the long terminal half-life of lipoglycopeptides in serum following IV administration is associated with emergence of resistance in normal bacterial flora is unknown. This study determined the susceptibility to ORI and vancomycin (VAN) of pairs of S. aureus isolates from nasal swabs at baseline and post-baseline in a Phase 2 study of IV ORI for treatment of ABSSSI. Methods. Study SD001 was a Phase 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blind efficacy and safety study of ORI in adults with ABSSSI. Patients received IV ORI either as a 1200 mg dose, 200 mg once daily for 3–7 days, or 800 mg on Day 1 plus 400 mg on Day 5, at the Investigator's discretion. Nasal swabs were collected from patients at baseline and at the Test-of-Cure (ToC) visit (Day 21–29). S. aureus isolates cultured from swabs locally were sent to a central laboratory for susceptibility testing against ORI, VAN and other comparators by broth microdilution (CLSI M7 guidelines). Results. Overall, 124 patients had nasal swabs performed at baseline and ToC. A total of 29 pairs (baseline and ToC) of S. aureus isolates, 44.8% of which were MRSA, were available for confirmatory susceptibility testing. The median interval between baseline and ToC visit in these 29 patients was 22 days. ORI MIC range (0.015–0.12 µg/mL; 100% susceptible) and MIC50/MIC90 (0.03/0.06 µg/mL) were identical for baseline and ToC isolates. VAN MIC range (0.25–1/2 µg/mL; 100% susceptible) and MIC50/MIC90 (0.5/1 µg/mL) were within 2-fold for baseline and ToC isolates. ORI and VAN MICs of all ToC isolates were within 2-fold of respective MICs of the corresponding isolate at baseline. Conclusion. In this Phase 2 study, one quarter of tested patients carried S. aureus in the anterior nares both at baseline and at ToC. ORI and VAN MICs of S. aureus isolates from ToC were within 2-fold of the MICs of the corresponding baseline isolates, suggesting that IV ORI treatment was not associated with changes in susceptibility to either ORI or VAN among nasal carriage isolates of S. aureus in patients with ABSSSI in this study. Disclosures. F. Arhin, The Medicines Company: Employee, Salary G. Moeck, The Medicines Company: Employee, Salary

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.934

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.369 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it