Efectos socioterritoriales de la mega minería y reacción social: el caso de Minera Alumbrera en la provincia de Catamarca, Argentina
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESUMENEste artículo aborda la implementación de la minería a gran escala y los efectos socioterritoriales que esta genera a través del estudio de caso de Andalgalá, ciudad argentina ubicada en la zona donde se llevó a cabo el proyecto minero a cielo abierto Bajo la Alumbrera.Se realizaron entrevistas a diversos actores socioeconómicos involucrados con el objetivo, por una parte, de documentar las transformaciones socioterritoriales provocadas en la comunidad local, producto de la intervención minera, y, por otra parte, de analizar la respuesta de la sociedad civil, y en particular el rol jugado por la mujer en el movimiento social de oposición a la megaminería.Se concluye que los beneficios del megaproyecto para la comunidad son débiles y mal redistribuidos, que las desigualdades se han visto acrecentadas en diversas escalas, y se destaca el papel protagónico que ha jugado la mujer en el movimiento social engendrado en la oposición a este proyecto extractivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".