Efectos socioterritoriales de la mega minería y reacción social: el caso de Minera Alumbrera en la provincia de Catamarca, Argentina
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article addresses the implementation of large-scale mining projects and their social and spatial eff ects in the Argentinian province of Catamarca. A case study was carried out in the town of Andalgal, located within the area of operation of the open-pit mining project Bajo la Alumbrera. Interviews were made with various stakeholders aff ected by the project with the objective to analyze, on one side, diff erent dimensions of socio-territorial transformations provoked by the project, and, on the other side, the civil society-based movement which emerged in reaction to it and namely the role played by women. The article concludes that the benefits of the megaproject are weak and poorly redistributed, that the inequalities have been reinforced at diff erent scales, and that women have been important protagonists of the social movement triggered by the opposition to the project.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".