MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2565514690 · doi:10.1093/hgs/dcw073

Distance from the Belsen Heap: Allied Forces and the Liberation of a Nazi Concentration Camp

2016· article· en· W2565514690 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHolocaust and Genocide Studies · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNazismThe HolocaustNazi concentration campsHistoryLawSociologyMedia studiesPolitical sciencePolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is well known that Canadians were among the troops who liberated Bergen-Belsen concentration camp in April 1945, as well as among the nurses and charity workers who aided in the mammoth undertaking of treating the survivors. But until now, no one has offered an in-depth analysis of who these Canadians were, how they came to be at Belsen, and what they did while there. Mark Celinscak does a valuable service in correcting this oversight. Although the story he tells is in general a familiar one to scholars who have focused on Belsen after its liberation, the detail he provides offers stimulating reading and a great deal of new information. His book is yet again proof that much new material on the Holocaust remains to be discovered, and that even the best-known parts of the history hold secrets yet to be uncovered. Celinscak's book is most successful when the author discusses the individuals who were at Belsen, whether as soldiers, nurses, war artists, military chaplains, or photographers. Their stories are deeply researched. The people described in the book do not exist as names only: they all come with full details of their biographies, their writings, and their other activities. The level of research here is impressive: Celinscak has talked with relatives, tracked down family archives, and obtained obscure publications. We learn, for example, of Canadian artist Lieutenant Alex Colville, the only one of the three Canadian war artists officially instructed to depict the camp. Celinscak discusses Colville's images sensitively and trenchantly, providing plentiful information on the artist's career trajectory and response to the camp. The author also introduces us to Lyle Creeman, the Canadian who became chief nurse of the British zone of occupied Germany with UNRRA. Creeman's thoughts on the necessity of employing German nurses in the camp provide much insight into the exigencies of the situation. The same is true for numerous individuals discussed in the book: Celinscak is a sure guide to their backgrounds and positions as well to their reactions to what they encountered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.776
Threshold uncertainty score0.956

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it