MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2565519306

Integration of new technology into a high-risk underserved community: Pilot studies within an oral cancer screening clinic.

2006· article· en· W2565519306 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Catherine F. Poh, Brenda Currie, Gregory Hislop, Lewei Zhang, Sean Sikorski, Calum MacAulay, Miriam P. Rosin

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicOral Health Pathology and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTriageCancerIntervention (counseling)DiseaseFamily medicineMedical emergencyPathologyInternal medicinePsychiatry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

B9 Oral cancer is a deadly disease characterized by both high mortality and morbidity. Early identification of this disease in the community is key to its management; however, globally, we have yet to develop effective screening regimes in such settings. This is especially true for underprivileged populations with marginalized life styles and poor access to care, but where the need is greatest. Objective : To pilot an oral cancer screening intervention in a clinic that services a high-risk hard-to-reach community in the Vancouver Downtown Eastside (DTES), utilizing a triage system under development in British Columbia. This system will integrate visualization, computer imaging and molecular tools to identify cases at risk in the community and triage them to treatment. This abstract describes the initial phase of this study. Method: In September 2004, an oral cancer-screening clinic was established in a pre-existing community dental clinic in the DTES. Patients attending the clinic for regular dental workups were offered screening, utilizing both conventional techniques and visualization aids (fluorescence visualization and toluidine blue retention). Samples of exfoliated cells were collected from lesion and control sites for future assessment of phenotypic change with high throughput computer technologies. Results: To date, 200 of 204 (98%) patients approached have agreed to screening. Of these, the majority were at high-risk for oral cancer: ever smokers (89%) and regular consumers of alcohol (89%), often immunocompromised (HIV and HCV), with a high usage of illicit drugs. Trauma, infection and inflammation were common - often masking the visualization of clinical features. Leukoplakia was seen in 31 patients and all showed significant alteration in fluorescence, with 13 (42%) also showing toluidine blue staining. To date, 12 of these 13 cases have been biopsied, showing 2 cancers and 8 precancers. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of establishing screening activities in dental clinics in poor, medically underserved populations and supports the utility of screening devices in such groups. Future work will integrate computer technologies to facilitate the differentiation of lesions at risk (and requiring biopsy) among cases in which the disease could be masked by chronic trauma and infection. (Supported by grants R01DE13124, R01DE17013, NIDCR, and salary support to CFP from CIHR).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.254
Threshold uncertainty score0.957

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.273
GPT teacher head0.481
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Epidemiology and Prevention BiomarkersSame topicOral Health Pathology and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207