Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: This study was to investigate the factors influencing adaptation of Korean students studying abroad. Methods: The subjects were 135 Korean students attending in middle and high school, and college in Canada. Data was collected from December 10 2008 to January 20 2009. Data was analyzed by T-test, ANOVA, X2-test, Fisher`s exact test, Pearson coefficient of correlation and multiple regression analysis using SPSS for Windows, version 19.0. Results: Academic stress level was below the average, and examination stress was highest and relationship stress with teachers was lowest among stress subscales. Inactive coping strategy was used by 93.7% of subjects. Academic stress was different from gender, age, course of studying, period of study abroad, and english level of subjects. Academic stress was significantly related with age and period of study abroad. Age was significantly related with period of study abroad and english level. Period of study abroad was significantly related with english level and adaptation level. English level was significantly related with adaptation level. Period of study abroad and english level effect on adaptation level. Conclusions: Academic stress of Korean students studying in Canada was lower. However, stress management program would be needed for the students, who couldn`t adapt and use active coping strategy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".