Gas holdup, bubble behaviour, and mass transfer characteristics in a two‐stage internal loop airlift reactor with different screens
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Screen internals were used in a two‐dimensional two‐stage internal loop airlift reactor (ILALR). The influence of screens on the hydrodynamics and mass transfer characteristics in the two‐stage ILALR, including gas holdup, mean bubble diameter, bubble rise velocity, and volumetric mass transfer coefficient ( K L a ), have been experimentally investigated. It is found that screens can efficiently break bubbles up. Radial bubble velocity distribution is more uniform when screens are installed. Mean bubble diameter with smaller screen pores seems smaller and slightly increases with the increasing of superficial gas velocity U g . A larger gas holdup and K L a can be obtained when a suitable screen is mounted. The variation trend of overall gas holdup and interfacial area a with U g is similar. A nearly constant liquid‐side mass transfer coefficient ( K L ) is found. The empirical correlations for the overall gas holdup and K L a have been proposed, which fit the experimental data well.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it