MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2565600467

Fifty Years in the Front Line

2006· article· en· W2565600467 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peter Coleman

Bibliographic record

VenueQuadrant · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAustralian History and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)ArtFront (military)PrecinctArt historyQuadrant (abdomen)StudioArchaeologyAncient historyVisual artsCartographyHistoryGeographyMeteorology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quadrant first fetched breath, fifty years back, in the eastern fringe of what was then a bohemian or arts quarter of Sydney. It ran from the Con across to The Rocks, from Hunter Street down to the Quay. Norman Lindsay used to have a studio in Bridge Street. Nearby were Bryant's Playhouse, the New Theatre, the Julian Ashton Art School, Smith's Weekly, the Bulletin, Angus and Robertson the publisher, and Tyrrell's second-hand bookshop. We are sitting in that historic precinct now, on the site of Jim Buckley's bohemian Newcastle Hotel, long since demolished to make way for this splendid palace.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score0.762

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2280.070

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuadrantSame topicAustralian History and SocietyFrench-language works237,207