Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rapid rise of the United States benefits from the western exploitation; and the first question that comes from the development of western regions, is the ownership of the land. American Indians are originally of the earliest residents of this stretch of land, but they have never formed the system of occupying and developing the land and confirming their sovereignty effectively, which gives the White man with advanced culture the pretext to attack and occupy. Because of the sharply increased population and immigrants, the White society endures stronger pressure on the land resources; therefore, immigrating into the west becomes one of the most effective way to lighten the pressure. Consequently, the land problem is very crucial for the existence and development of White society. Because of the enormous difference of the cultural system, the way of utilizing lands of India is obviously different from that of the White society. They engage in extensive agriculture or make a living by hunting. This kind of life style has an outstanding characteristic—it needs a very large region. This means that the contradiction on the land, is a kind of harsh struggle for existence between American Indians and White men. It has indicated that the White society is determined to capture American Indian’s land.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".