MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Type 3 Von Willebrand Disease: Plasma Versus Platelets.

2009· article· en· W2565676304 on OpenAlexaff
Walter H.A. Kahr, Fred G. Pluthero, Victor S. Blanchette, Katherine Robinson, David Lillicrap, Paula D. James

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversitySickKids FoundationDalhousie UniversityHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVon Willebrand diseaseVon Willebrand factorPlateletMissense mutationChemistryInternal medicineMolecular biologyCompound heterozygosityImmunologyEndocrinologyMutationMedicineBiologyGeneBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 3059 Poster Board II-1035 Type 3 von Willebrand disease (VWD) is characterized by the virtual absence of von Willebrand factor (VWF) in plasma. Affected individuals are usually either homozygous or compound heterozygous for mutations that have been identified throughout the 52 exon VWF gene (listed in the ISTH SSC VWF database, http://www.sheffield.ac.uk/vwf/index.html). Most are null mutations associated with deletions, insertions, frameshifts, splicing defects and premature stop codons, however, a number of missense mutations have also been identified. VWF is normally stored in the Weibel-Palade bodies of vascular endothelial cells and within platelet alpha granules. Thus, the absence of plasma VWF in type 3 VWD patients carrying non-null mutations could be explained by one or more of: 1) premature mRNA degradation; 2) improper folding or assembly of VWF within cells resulting in proteolytic degradation; 3) rapid clearance of defective VWF molecules from plasma; 4) inability of synthesized VWF to be properly stored and/or released. We set out to detect type 3 VWD patients with possible VWF plasma clearance, storage or release defects by measuring the relative amounts of VWF in platelets and plasma, reasoning that such defects may be associated with the accumulation of VWF in platelets. Blood was prospectively collected from 21 previously diagnosed cases. Laboratory evaluation confirmed type 3 VWD, if the VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo levels were '5 IU per dL or if the VWF:Ag or VWF:RCo levels were 6-10 IU per dL accompanied by FVIII levels of '10 IU per dL. From this cohort, 16 unrelated type 3 VWD index cases were identified. Equivalent amounts of plasma and platelet lysates were analyzed for VWF by immunoblotting. As expected, platelet and plasma VWF were observed to be very low or absent in most cases. Interestingly, 5 patients were found to have relatively more (∼10 fold) platelet than plasma VWF using semiquantitative immunoblotting and equivalent sample loading. Type 3 VWD index cases together with available type 1 VWD siblings were subjected to VWF gene sequencing analyses. VWF exons 1-52 as well as ∼1500 bp of the promoter and intron/exon boundaries were sequenced. Strategies to identify partial gene deletions are ongoing. VWF gene mutations were identified in 12/16 patients. Surprisingly, in 4 out of the 5 patients with discrepant VWF content in plasma and platelets, no mutation in the VWF gene was identified by sequencing, suggesting either that an in-frame partial deletion or intronic VWF mutation may be present or that other genes such as those regulating the assembly, storage or release of VWF could be affected. A novel homozygous frameshift mutation at position c.8418_8419 resulting from a TCCC insertion was identified in one case. The presence of platelet VWF in this patient suggests that despite this frameshift mutation, VWF is expressed and packaged into platelets. Two siblings with the same homozygous mutation had an identical pattern (no plasma VWF but platelet VWF present) whereas two heterozygous siblings had 10-30% plasma VWF:Ag with normal amounts of platelet VWF. Studies are underway to determine whether increased clearance or defects in storage and/or release from endothelial cells or platelets are the cause of absent plasma VWF. Our studies also suggest that type 3 VWD can be subcategorized into subtype 0 (no plasma no platelet VWF) versus subtype P (no plasma but platelet VWF present) by measuring plasma and platelet VWF. We hypothesize that patients with type 3 VWD with platelet-harbouring VWF may have milder clinical manifestations compared to the subtype 0, however further studies are needed to test this proposal. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments→French-language works237,207→