Optimal beamforming-based power control in wireless body area networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We prove the existence and uniqueness of a Stack-elberg equilibrium when different selfish single antenna sensor nodes try to access a multiple antenna hub in the uplink of a wireless body area network (WBAN). The hub is the game leader, capable of punishing the deviating sensors by using its multiple antennas to block reception for a specified period of time. Sensor nodes are the followers, each seeking to choose a transmit power to independently maximize its utility, modeled as a weighted difference between its achievable goodput and the expense of transmission. At the same time, the hub seeks to force the nodes to communicate their packets at certain transmit powers that maximize the welfare of the WBAN. We demonstrate this setup enables the Stackelberg game to reach a unique subgame perfect equilibrium. The proposed game model is employed in an IEEE 802.15.6-based ultra wideband WBAN to numerically validate the merits of the framework.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it