MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2565751032 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2015-4612

Abstract 4612: Genetic variants in epigenetic pathways and risk of multiple cancer types in the GAME-ON consortium

2015· article· en· W2565751032 on OpenAlexaff
Dominique Scherer, Réka Tóth, Linda E. Kelemen, Angela Risch, Aditi Hazra, Jean‐Pierre J. Issa, Vı́ctor Moreno, Rosalind A. Eeles, John Quackenbush, Ellen L. Goode, Shuji Ogino, Cornelia M. Ulrich

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNutrition, Genetics, and Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpigeneticsBiologySingle-nucleotide polymorphismDNA methylationGenome-wide association studyGeneticsProstate cancerCancerChromatin remodelingHistoneChromatinOdds ratioColorectal cancerOncologyBioinformaticsGeneGenotypeInternal medicineMedicineGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Epigenetic changes are reversible features of the genome that regulate gene transcription and protein expression on several levels including DNA methylation, histone modification or miRNA expression. We investigated the association between inherited variation in genes of key epigenetic processes and risk of multiple cancers within the GAME-ON consortium. Methods We performed a pathway based meta-analysis using genotypes from more than 50,000 cases of breast, lung, prostate, ovarian and colorectal cancer cases and more than 60,000 controls from various genome wide association studies participating in the GAME-ON consortium to estimate associations with cancer risk. Using the 1000GenomeProject database, we selected 505,702 genotyped and imputed single nucleotide polymorphisms in 551 genes (flanking region +/- 250kb) related to DNA methylation, histone modification or chromatin remodeling based on GO and GeneCard databases. In order to allow variants to be associated with only a subset of traits we used subset based meta-analysis. False-discovery rate (FDR) corrected p-values (q-values) lower than 0.05 were considered significant. Results and Discussion 582 SNPs were significantly associated with risk of at least one cancer. We identified nine major regions that showed significant associations with more than one cancer type. Among the most interesting regions was the region around PHC3 (3q36), which showed associations with prostate and colorectal cancer and clear cell ovarian carcinomas. PHC3 is involved in chromatin remodeling and plays a role in epithelial neoplasms. Significant Odds ratios (ORs) ranged from 0.80 to 1.31. The number of risk and protective alleles in this region was similarly distributed (19 and 18, respectively). One of the strongest associations was observed for rs76925190 (intronic in PRKC1), which increased the risk of colorectal and prostate cancer (q-value 4.28*10-10). Variants in this region were previously associated with prostate cancer. Polymorphisms in the region (19q13) around BABAM1 (RISC and BRCA1 A complex member 1), were associated with lung, breast, ovarian and prostate cancer. BABAM1 is associated with the BRCA1-complex. Its function in histone modification and DNA repair emphasizes its importance in carcinogenesis. Significant ORs ranged from 0.88 to 1.14 with similar distribution of risk and protective alleles in this region (19 and 17, respectively). The strongest association was observed for rs4808076 (intronic in ANKLE1), which increased the risk of squamous lung, serous ovarian and ER- -breast cancer (q-value 2.40*10-6). Variants in this region were previously associated with risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Conclusions This study emphasizes the importance of variants in genes of epigenetic processes on cancer risk and further provides insights into novel, pleiotropic epigenetic mechanisms of cancer development. Citation Format: Dominique Scherer, Reka Toth, Linda Kelemen, Angela Risch, Aditi Hazra, Jean Pierre Issa, Victor Moreno, Rosalind A. Eeles, John Quackenbush, Ellen L. Goode, Shuji Ogino, Rayjean Hung, Cornelia M. Ulrich. Genetic variants in epigenetic pathways and risk of multiple cancer types in the GAME-ON consortium. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 4612. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-4612

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicNutrition, Genetics, and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207