PENGARUH HIPNOSIS 5 JARI TERHADAP TINGKAT KECEMASAN PASIEN SIRKUMSISI DI TEMPAT PRAKTIK MANDIRI MULYOREJO SUKUN MALANG
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sirkumsisi merupakan tidakan pembedahan prepusium penis karena pengaruh budaya dan cara berfikir membuat semua orang melakukan tindakan ini termasuk di negara-negara seperti Angola 99%, Australia 98%, Canada 96%, Indonesia 12%. Paling umum dilakukan pada laki-laki dan variasi respon kecemasan yang muncul tiap orang tingkatannya berbeda-beda. Salah satu cara mengatasi kecemasan adalah hipnosis 5 jari. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengetahui pengaruh hipnosis 5 jari terhadap tingkat kecemasan pasien sirkumsisi di tempat praktik mandiri Mulyorejo Sukun Malang. Metode penelitian yang di gunakan pre experimental design dengan one-group pretest-posttest design. Sampel penelitian semua pasien sirkumsisi yang memenuhi kriteria inklusi penelitian dalam kurun waktu tertentu sesuai penentuan peneliti dengan teknik “konsekutif sampling”. Hasil : Pre test sebelum hipnosis 5 jari didapatkan 6 responden yang bersedia, (83%) 5 responden memiliki kecemasan ringan dan (17%) 1 responden memiliki kecemasan sedang. Post test Sesudah hipnosis 5 jari terhadap (83%) 5 responden berubah jadi tidak ada kecemasan dan (17%) 1 responden. Hasil uji statistik Wilxocon signed rank test dengan nilai signifikan 0,043 yang berarti lebih kecil dari signifikan 0,05. Bagi peneliti selanjutnya memperhatikan jarak waktu perlakuan hipnosis 5 jari harus sama dan umur, status urutan anak laki-laki, jumlah saudara dalam keluarga yang sama. Kata Kunci : Hipnosis 5 Jari, Tingkat Kecemasan, Sirkumsisi
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".