MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2565799477

Review of doubled Haploidy methodologies in ornamental species

2011· article· en· W2565799477 on OpenAlexaffvenue
A. M. R. Ferrie, Karen Caswell

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Canadian institutionsPlant Biotechnology Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrnamental plantEnvironmental scienceBusinessBiologyEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ornamental species are an important group of plants produced mainly for their aesthetic value and to enhance both our indoor and outdoor environments. Development of new germplasm with enhanced colours, fragrances, or longevity is an important aspect of plant breeding programs. Tissue culture methods have been utilized to propagate favourable genotypes. Haploidy methodology is commonly used in many agronomically important crops to speed up the breeding program by developing uniform lines. Haploids and doubled haploid protocols can be used for both practical application, as in breeding, mutagenesis, and genetic transformation, as well as basic research (i.e. biochemical, physiological and genomic studies). This review will focus on in vitro haploid production in several ornamental species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score0.976

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.250
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.067 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicHermeneutics and Narrative IdentityFrench-language works237,207