MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2565805514 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjw221

Five-year Safety Data From ENCORE, a European Observational Safety Registry for Adults With Crohn’s Disease Treated With Infliximab [Remicade<sup>®</sup>] or Conventional Therapy

2016· article· en· W2565805514 on OpenAlexaff
Geert D’Haens, Walter Reinisch, Jean–Frédéric Colombel, Julián Panés, Subrata Ghosh, Cosimo Prantera, Stefan Lindgren, Daniël W. Hommes, Zhiping Huang, Judith A. Boice, Susan Huyck, Freddy Cornillie

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryMcMaster UniversityMcMaster University Medical Centre
FundersMerck
KeywordsMedicineInfliximabCrohn's diseaseObservational studyInflammatory bowel diseaseDiseasePatient safetyInternal medicineMedical physicsSurgeryIntensive care medicineHealth care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The ENCORE registry aimed at comparing the long-term safety of Crohn's disease [CD] treatment with infliximab [Remicade®] and with conventional therapies in real-world clinical practice. METHODS: The 5-year, prospective, observational ENCORE registry followed patients with CD in nine European countries, who received treatment with infliximab, conventional therapies, or switched to infliximab from conventional therapy. Adverse events [AEs] in pre-specified categories and serious AEs were recorded at least every 6 months of the 5-year observation period. Frequency of events was evaluated, and multivariable analyses using follow-up time [Cox proportion hazards model] and exposure time [Poisson regression] were used to identify risk factors for time to AEs in pre-specified categories. RESULTS: Patients who received infliximab [N = 1541], conventional therapies [N = 1121], or switched to infliximab [N = 298] were followed for medians of 60.4, 55.6, and 42.5 months, respectively. Infliximab median exposure was 18.7 and 19.3 months in the infliximab and switched-to-infliximab groups, respectively. In time-to-event Cox proportion hazards [PH] analyses adjusting for confounders, infliximab [vs conventional therapy] was associated with serious infections (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17, 2.31] and haematological conditions [HR = 2.91, CI: 1.51, 5.59], and not associated with lymphoproliferative disorders/malignancy [HR = 1.44, CI: 0.86, 2.42] or death [HR = 1.22, CI: 0.63, 2.36]. Prednisone use was associated with higher mortality [HR = 3.58, CI: 1.49, 8.61]. In exposure-adjusted Poisson regression analyses, infliximab was associated with lower mortality (risk ratio [[RR] 0.39, CI: 0.17, 0.88]). CONCLUSIONS: Data from 5-year safety follow-up of patients with CD in the ENCORE registry demonstrate that infliximab [Remicade®] exposure is associated with increased risk of serious infections and haematological conditions, whereas mortality may be decreased.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.802
Threshold uncertainty score0.513

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations73
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and ColitisSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207