MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2565882355 · doi:10.7202/1033719ar

Pour une approche du fait de solitude : la sociabilité des jeunes

2015· article· fr· W2565882355 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Review of Community Development · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophySolitudePolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parler de la solitude, c’est s’interroger sur la nature et l’évolution du rapport social dans une société donnée. Partant de l’idée selon laquelle l’évolution globale du lien social se caractérise par une moindre intensité du rapport à l’autre inhérente à la fonctionnalisation croissante du champ relationnel, l’auteur esquisse, dans un premier temps, un cadre global d’analyse susceptible de rendre intelligible cette évolution tendancielle. Il essaie alors de cerner ce qui peut être au principe des formes de solitude auxquelles nous sommes exposés. Dans un second temps, il s’intéresse à la sociabilité d’une population spécifique : les jeunes inscrits dans les dispositifs d’insertion relevant des politiques sociales de la jeunesse, population qui, selon sa perspective, encourt le risque de solitude. En confrontant son cadre théorique à ses données d’enquête, il souligne alors toute la complexité de ce phénomène.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.710
Threshold uncertainty score0.980

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it