MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2565903808 · doi:10.1113/ep085978

Effects of early and delayed initiation of exercise training on cardiac and haemodynamic function after spinal cord injury

2016· article· en· W2565903808 on OpenAlexafffund
David Popok, Christopher R. West, Laura McCracken, Andrei V. Krassioukov

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental Physiology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Cord Injury Research
Canadian institutionsGF Strong Rehabilitation CentreVancouver Coastal HealthInternational Collaboration On Repair DiscoveriesUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCraig H. Neilsen Foundation
KeywordsMedicineAutonomic dysreflexiaSpinal cord injuryHemodynamicsCardiac function curveCardiologySpinal cordHindlimbAnesthesiaInternal medicineBlood pressureHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

NEW FINDINGS: What is the central question of this study? How does early versus delayed initiation of passive hindlimb cycling, as well as detraining, affect cardiac function and blood pressure control in a rodent model of spinal cord injury? What is the main finding and its importance? Early or delayed initiation of hindlimb cycling improves cardiac and haemodynamic function in spinal cord injury, although the benefits of early administration are more pronounced. We also demonstrate the need for exercise to be maintained, because detraining rapidly reverses the cardiac and haemodynamic benefits. Spinal cord injury (SCI) reduces physical activity and alters descending supraspinal cardiovascular control, predisposing this population to early onset of cardiovascular disease. We used a T3 SCI rodent model to investigate the effect of early versus delayed passive hindlimb cycling (PHLC), as well as the effect of detraining on cardiac dysfunction and blood pressure control, including autonomic dysreflexia (AD). Twenty male Wistar rats were divided into an early PHLC initiation group followed by a period of detraining (PHLC starting day 6 post-SCI, for 4 weeks, followed by 4 weeks of detraining; 'early PHLC/detraining' group) and a delayed PHLC intervention group (no PHLC for first 5 weeks post-SCI, followed by PHLC for 4 weeks; 'no PHLC/delayed PHLC' group). At 5 weeks post-SCI, the no PHLC/delayed PHLC group exhibited a decline in almost all cardiac indices (all P < 0.029), which was maintained in the early PHLC/detraining group. Also, the severity of induced AD was reduced in the early PHLC/detraining versus no PHLC/delayed PHLC group (all P < 0.0279). At 9 weeks post-SCI, no PHLC/delayed PHLC animals exhibited a reversal of cardiac dysfunction such that all indices were not different from pre-SCI, whereas early PHLC/detraining rats exhibited a reduction in all cardiac indices relative to pre-SCI (all P < 0.049), except ejection fraction. Between weeks 7 and 9 post-SCI, the no PHLC/delayed PHLC rats exhibited fewer spontaneous AD events than the early PHLC/detraining rats (P < 0.01). We show, for the first time, that delayed exercise promotes similar improvements in cardiac and haemodynamic function to those observed with early initiation. Furthermore, exercise needs to be maintained, because detraining reduces these cardiohaemodynamic benefits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.541
Threshold uncertainty score0.314

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExperimental PhysiologySame topicSpinal Cord Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207