MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2566082849 · doi:10.1109/crv.2016.17

Registration of Modern and Historic Imagery for Timescape Creation

2016· article· en· W2566082849 on OpenAlexaff
Heider K. Ali, Anthony Whitehead

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigitizationComputer scienceCultural heritageScope (computer science)Computer visionArtificial intelligenceVisualizationComputer graphics (images)Image registrationImage (mathematics)GeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The creation of temporal of panoramic visualization (timescapes) of historic landmarks given the available photos on the Internet is a challenging problem. Dealing with hundreds of thousands of modern and historic photos captured under varying conditions not only has the typical image registration problems, but suffers greatly from multisensor, multitemporal, and multispatial capturing attributes. As well, imprecise lenses and digitization techniques used to generate digital versions of historic images only increases the difficulty of the registration problem. An automated processing of collected photos of many landmarks around the world is presented in this paper and offers a novel view of these registered images using the timescapes concept of merging historical and location information into a single scope. Registering both historic and modern photos in an accurate and precise manner allows an opportunity to support the cultural heritage preservations of such landmarks. This paper presents a timescape display through registered images of landmarks in a single attractive temporal and spatial panoramic view.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.817
Threshold uncertainty score0.112

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesFrench-language works237,207