MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2566237917

Mýtus o Šambhale a jeho burjatská aktualizace ve 20. století

2002· article· cs· W2566237917 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Luboš Bělka

Bibliographic record

VenueReligio revue pro religionistiku · 2002
Typearticle
Languagecs
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicIndian and Buddhist Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTheologyArtPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sambhalský mýtus představuje jednu z tradicnich forem tibetske buddhisticke eschatologie. Mýtus samotný, jakož i rozmanita výtvarna zobrazeni s nim spojena, vyvolal v euroamerickem prostředi od 18. stoleti dodnes velký zajem jak akademických badatelů, tak i zapadnich buddhistů, mystiků, tibetofilů atp. Text se zabýva jak sambhalským mýtem a jeho zobrazenimi, tak i jeho zapadni recepci a svebytným přetvařenim. Kromě Tibetu byla Sambhala neobycejně popularni i v dalsich oblastech rozsiřeni tibetskeho buddhismu, jako je napřiklad Mongolsko a Burjatsko. Zde sambhalský mýtus v průběhu 20. stoleti prodělaval vlastni, na Tibetu nezavislý vývoj, politicky se aktualizoval a to zejmena ve dvacatých a třicatých letech.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.444
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReligio revue pro religionistikuSame topicIndian and Buddhist StudiesFrench-language works237,207