A novel multilateral teleoperation scheme with power-based time-domain passivity control
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multilateral teleoperation systems, which are extended from the traditional bilateral teleoperation, have become subject to increasing attention in current years, with increasing industrial requirements, such as the remote operation of larger objects and more complex tasks. In this paper, a general multilateral teleoperation control problem is discussed, in which n masters remotely control n slaves through delayed communication channels. A novel communication structure is proposed to satisfy the multiple master–slave communication requirement, in which weighting coefficients are chosen freely to perform the weighted effects of different masters or slaves. Power-based time-domain passivity control is subsequently developed for the complex multiple master–slave communication channel, to achieve the passivity of multilateral teleoperation systems under time delay. Experiments on a teleoperation system with two masters and two slaves are described; the results verify the effectiveness of the proposed control scheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it