Economia e política da transição democrática no Brasil: uma análise dos governos FHC, Lula e Dilma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O objetivo principal do trabalho é contribuir aos estudos de economia e política nas ciências sociais, com foco de análise na transição democrática brasileira e no debate sobre a relação entre redemocratização política e crise econômica. O artigo se concentra na análise dos governos FHC, Lula e Dilma, buscando analisar aspectos políticos e econômicos dos três diferentes governos, como a política econômica, a questão da inflação, o papel do Estado na economia, estabilidade econômica e a crise final do governo Dilma, ocorrida em abril de 2016. O trabalho sugere que a crise final do governo Dilma e o impeachment representam um ponto de inflexão no processo de transição democrática e a uma crise nas promessas da Constituição de 1988. O trabalho foi elaborado especialmente para o seminário Transição Democrática: aspectos sociológicos e políticos, que ocorreu na UFPel em novembro de 2015.Palavras-Chave: Crise econômica e democracia; Economia e política da transição democrática; Governos FHC, Lula e Dilma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".